General Process Considerations In The Selection Of Agitators For Simple Applications And Impeller Design


Classification towards Purpose
a. Blending of miscible liquids

Easiest of agitating applications and normally axial turbine or hydrofoil impellers are preferred. Jet mixing by recirculation with an ordinary pump is equally good at lower cost


b. Dissolving

In dissolving, we want provision of high flow rate and low shear past the solid surface. Unless the solid is polymeric or sticky or viscous in nature, it is an easy operation. Data solicited are solid percentage, physical characteristics with interim changes, temp, solubility and permissible dissolving time.


c. Dispersion (liquid- liquid, solid-liquid)

Dispersion refers to mixing of non-miscible liquids or of solids in liquids, into somewhat homogeneous mass whose stability is measured by its life before reasonable separation occurs. Power input varies greatly depending on purpose and impellers generally used are pitched blade turbine, or saw tooth cutter. This is most critical of mixing problems and unless properly understood, the design is liable to fail.


d. Heat exchange

Used to speed up heat transfer by forced convection. Apparently simple but for critical applications, following data helps.

  • Tank dimensions and details of jacket and coils, preferably G.A.drawing.
  • Heat transfer co-efficients
  • Specific heats and thermal conductivities
  • Temp. of batch at start and end of cycle
  • Temp. – Viscosity curve of components
  • Whether solid suspension is included

e. Emulsification

Imparting a high power to break the molecular chains and to form the oil-water emulsion with a non-ionic surfactant. Other applications are mainly in paints & lubricants sector. Some emulsion may be steady for years and some break within minutes. Static mixers are preferred than agitators for high instantaneous power resulting better emulsion but washing pump & pipeline is problematic.


f. Solids suspension

It is simple physical (like mixing) operation but power consumption varies greatly on purpose e.g. a> complete motion of solids, b> complete suspension of solids, c> complete uniformity. Power req. is in ratio of 1: 2: 5 for said operations.


g. Chemical reaction

It can be considered as combination of blending, dissolving, heat transfer, extraction, gas dispersion, and solid suspension etc. Usually an easy task from agitator designer’s point but to be sure, pilot plant study is always recommended. A haphazard selection is vulnerable and over design (like peripheral impeller tip speed) has various detrimental effects on the final product.


h. Extraction including washing and leaching

This is normally a continuous counter- current (fluidized bed) process like solid suspension involving water to be well mixed up with other ingredients and the ingredients separates out by gravity separation. Usually of interest for mining people.


i. Gas dispersion, absorption, and stripping

Gas is impregnated from bottom as small bubbles and intimately distributed throughout the liquid usually resulting a chemical reaction. Generally curved vane impeller or multiple turbines are preferred with high speed. Fully baffled tanks should be tall and narrow in construction. Pressurized chamber accelerates the process. A better way is by static mixer employing a liquid pump and a pressurized semi- permeable solid wall to impregnate gas under pressure.


j. Crystallization

It is opposite of dissolving and is accomplished by cooling a saturated solution or by heating to drive out the solvent. The heat transfer requires a good flow. Satisfactory handling of crystals is of prime importance. Pilot plant data are desired. Generally crystals deposit at the bottom but if process deserves to be uniformly suspended, much study on the crystal structure & sensitivity is to be made for speed selection. Fluid-foil or aerofoil impellers with high flow and low shear are suggested.



Now let us try to understand basic impeller design.

As like fan (for air handling) or hydel power turbines, much research has been conducted towards agitator impeller design and it is a very wide subject with much more further scope to research and improve. Impeller is designed mainly keeping in mind the purpose or application and sometimes custom built.

The basic designs are as follows.
A. Marine Propeller

Looks like a table fan blade. Suitable for high flow and low shear e.g. blending, dissolving, heat transfer, etc. Unsuitable for solid suspension, dispersion, extraction, gas dispersion, etc. flow efficiency- 50-60%. Getting outdated but manufacturers with their old proven designs are still sticking to that.


B. Pitched Blade Turbine

Looks like a table fan blade. Suitable for high flow and low shear e.g. blending, dissolving, heat transfer, etc. Unsuitable for solid suspension, dispersion, extraction, gas dispersion, etc. flow efficiency- 50-60%. Getting outdated but manufacturers with their old proven designs are still sticking to that.


C. Hydrofoil

Hydrofoil is supposed to be a foil in water and looks like pitched blade turbine with an angled cut on the lower periphery. Its flow efficiency is better than marine propeller, replacing the later in most applications and is most desired for mixing purposes but unsuitable for high shear application.


D. Aerofoil

aerofoil is having a classic stand fan blade type look and its properties are almost like hydrofoil impellers. Of interest for mining people for mineral washing and beneficiation for energy efficiency.


E. Curved Vane

Curved Vane impeller looks like straight Pelton wheel designed to hold moving particles for some time e.g. for air absorption.


F. Stator Rotor

Old outdated design supposed to bring highest shearing action and usually specified for oil-water emulsion.


G. Saw Tooth Cutter

Saw Tooth Cutter is reasonably good for handling medium to high viscous liquids. It is most economic for emulsification. Bad design for blending simple solutions as well as handling semi solids (grease, honey etc.). Suggested for oil-water emulsion, lubricants, paints, etc.


H. Anchor

Anchor (with its namely look) is used for heat transfer from bottom or scraping viscous liquids.


I. Helical Ribbon
  • Helical Ribbon looking like screwed ladder or double helix model of our gene. With its diameter close to tank diameter, is used for viscosity above 80 poise.
  • Another very effective design for handling viscous fluid is to use pitched blade turbine placed at bottom of draft tube (equaling 70% of tank dia.) at medium speed.
  • I am very sorry for my weakness even in rough schematic drawing that could have helped in better understanding.
  • Till date we very often encounter motor power selection much on higher side with no necessity. Again lower speed was thought to be superior in terms of application.
  • Now the international trend is that if the process permits (unless molecular chains break up or organic growth is hampered in biological processes) lower speeds are only negotiated with motor power reduction without affecting the application parameters.


Basic power calculation for turbulent flow is

P=K*NS* S.G*N3*D5/ 160000

WHERE

  • P= BREAK HORSE POWER (H.P.)
  • K= A CONSTANT VARIES GREATLY FROM 0.3 UPTO 8 AND IS DEPENDENT MAINLY ON BLADE GEOMETRY, TANK DIMENSIONS, BAFFLES, PHYSICAL FLUID CHARACTERISTICS, ETC. TERMED AS THE IMPELLER NUMBER.
  • NS= NO. OF IMPELLERS.
  • S.G. =SP.GR. OF THE LIQUID.
  • N= ROTATIONAL SPEED RPM.
  • D= IMPELLER DIAMETER IN METER.
  • Considering gear efficiency and motor margin, motor power is determined.

Power calculation in viscous fluid is cumbersome and then also is unreliable. We shamefully take motor margins as 50% minimum. For basics, BHP varies with 1st. power of rpm and 3rd. power of impeller diameter for viscous impellers. In fact for thumb rule at low speed, wattage equals the weight of total mass in grams transferred except in thixotropic conditions.

For both turbulent and viscous motion flow rate is determined by


Q= K*N*D3.


WHERE

  • Q= FLOW RATE IN CUBIC METER PER MINUTE.
  • K= PUMPING NUMBER MAX. 0.7 (FOR HIGH FLOW & LOW SHEAR) AND MIN. 0.01(FOR LOW FLOW & HIGH SHEAR).
  • N= RPM.
  • D= IMP. DIA IN MTRS.
  • The agitator price is somewhat very little in comparison to what a process would gain and deserves from a reasonably good design.

    Pilot plants do come and go but the commercial plant determines the profit percentage. It is always suggestable to go for much in-depth of pilot plant studies before arriving at the big risk time.

    Furthermore, in case of any doubt, checks and cross checks from different agencies are likely to be obtained and it is available at reasonable cost. Designer should have adequate experience in the proper application you are trying to achieve.

    In case you have any quarries/ suggestions, I would be glad to share our knowledge.


DATA USUALLY REQUIRED FOR PROPER DESIGN.
  • Purpose of agitation.
  • Mixing cycle.
  • Foaming tendency
  • Materials to be mixed with individual physical characters and their quantities.
  • Tank dimensions preferably with sketch
  • Duty hours
  • Electrical: 1 ph. Or 3 ph., flp or not etc


Types Of Agitators


Radial Impellers

RT3 RT4 RT5
Rushton Turbine with 3 blades Rushton Turbine with 4 blades Rushton Turbine with 5 blades
Np=3.3, Nq=0.62* D/T=0.33, wB/T=1/12 Np=4.3, Nq=0.68* D/T=0.33, wB/T=1/12 Np=5.4, Nq=0.73* D/T=0.33, wB/T=1/12
Np=3.4, Nq=0.62* D/T=0.33, wB/T=0.1 Np=4.4, Nq=0.68* D/T=0.33, wB/T=0.1 Np=5.4, Nq=0.73* D/T=0.33, wB/T=0.1
RT6 RT8 RT12
Chemineer D-6, Lightnin R100, Hayward Gordon RD Rushton Turbine with 8 blades Rushton Turbine with 12 blades
Rushton Turbine with 6 blades, Np=5.2, Nq=0.72 Np=7.8, Nq=0.82* D/T=0.33, wB/T=1/12 Np=9.9, Nq=0.89* D/T=0.33, wB/T=1/12
Np=6.0, D/T=0.33, wB/T=1/12 Np=7.8, Nq=0.82* D/T=0.33, wB/T=0.1 Np=10.0, Nq=0.90* D/T=0.33, wB/T=0.1
Np=6.0, D/T=0.33, wB/T=0.1
RP2 RP4 RP6
Paddle with 2 blades Lightnin R200 Paddle with 6 blades
No disk (disc) Paddle with 4 blades No disk (disc)
No disk (disc) Np=3.4, Nq=0.62*
Holmes & Narver pumper mixer Curved bladed pumper RS6
Lightnin R300 Lightnin R320, Philadelphia Mixers CBT-6 Chemineer CD-6, Lightnin R130
Np, Nq, and Nh-values Pumper impeller used for solvent extraction mixer settlers Philadelphia Mixers Smith Turbine, Hayward Gordon RDC
CFD study 6-curved blades on one side of disk Np=3.2, Nq=0.61*
CFD study
Chemineer BT-6 Bar turbine Sawtooth, Disperser
Np=2.3, Nq=0.55* Lightnin R510 Lightnin R500
Np=0.65, Nq=0.36* Np=0.45, Nq=0.32*
Experimentally derived Np and Nq values coming soon!

Axial Impellers

PR-D and PR-U 4PBT-D and 4PBT-U 6PBT-D
Chemineer AP-3, Lightnin A100 and A110 Chemineer P-4, Lightnin A200 Pitched bladed turbine - Down-pumping with 6 blades
Propeller - Down-pumping and Up-pumping Pitched blade turbine - Down-pumping and Up-pumping with 4 blades
Np=0.32 for 1.0 pitch, D/T=0.35, wB/T=0.1 Np=1.27, Nq=0.79
Np=0.36 for 1.0 pitch, D/T=0.22, wB/T=0.1
Np=0.62 for 1.5 pitch, D/T=0.22, wB/T=0.1
Np=1.00 for 2.0 pitch, D/T=0.31, wB/T=0.1
Np=1.35 for 2.5 pitch, D/T=0.22, wB/T=0.1
Note: Subtract 0.01 from Np for wB/T=1/12
Lightnin A6000 (down-pumper) Lightnin A310 or A510 (down-pumper) Chemineer HE-3 (down-pumper)
Advanced fiber reinforced composite, utilizing highly corrosion resistant plastic matrix, with proplets Np=0.30, Nq=0.56 Np=0.20, Nq=0.46 for D/T=0.5
Lightnin A6100 (down-pumper) Np=0.22, Nq=0.47 for D/T=0.4
Like the A6000 without proplets Np=0.26, Nq=0.49 for D/T=0.3
Np=0.23, Nq=0.59 Np=0.30, Nq=0.50 for D/T=0.2
Lightnin A312 Lightnin A320 (down-pumper) Lightnin A340 (up-pumper)
impeller mainly for side entry applications Np=0.64, Nq=0.64 Np=0.64, Nq=0.64
Lightnin A315 (down-pumper) Lightnin A345 (up-pumper) Specialty Impellers
Np=0.75, Nq=0.73 Np=0.75, Nq=0.73